Jennifer Mack in Wargames

For my first entry into the 2017 Reel Infatuation Blogathon, I picked Ally Sheedy’s Jennifer Mack from the 1983 thriller Wargames. I was sixteen in 1983, and, like Matthew Broderick’s Lightman, I thought she was perfect.  So, I watched the movie again with pen and paper in hand, waiting for something to key on, and I wrote down . . . not a whole lot. Ally Sheedy was twenty when she played Jennifer, and was way over the legal limit for being gorgeous, but, to my dismay, looked at closely, there really wasn’t a whole lot going on with her character. At one point, early on, she seems poised to be the fim’s moral compass. However, this quickly fades, and so does she for that matter–she completely disappears for a substantial portion of the movie only to  re-appear for the final act.  So I sat down with my laptop, looked at my notes, and waited for inspiration to come. In my notes, I had written down “Manic pixie dream girl?” And this being the only train of thought, I jumped on.

For those unfamiliar with the term, Nathan Rabin coined it in his review of Elizabethtown, a 2005 film directed by Cameron Crowe in which he describes the film’s female lead as “that bubbly, shallow cinematic creature that exists solely in the fevered imaginations of sensitive writer-directors to teach broodingly soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and adventures.” This track seemed somewhat promising; however, I didn’t like it for two reasons:

First, although some really great characters exemplify the archetype (e.g., Holly Go Lightly, Susan Vance from Bringing Up Baby, Sam from Garden State), there’s a political reality at the bottom of it that makes the whole thing kind of a bummer. Portraying female characters solely in relation to their male protagonist love interests denies them individual identity and thereby devalues the role of women. Cultural hegemony. That kind of thing.

Second, Jennifer Mack doesn’t really fit the mold. She’s certainly bubbly enough. And as someone who’s still thinking about how she was going to be on TV next week after learning of imminent nuclear destruction, it’s not entirely unfair, I think, to accuse her of being shallow as well. Lightman, however, can hardly be described as “broodingly soulful,” and absent a male with eyes that need to be opened, the archetype falls apart.

So, the train stopped, but not before making a stop at a much older and, duh, more obviously applicable archetype–the girl next door. Hello? Could there be a more perfect example of the girl next door than Jennifer?!  According to TV Tropes, “A ‘Girl Next Door’ is a character who . . . an ‘ordinary guy’ male protagonist might have known when growing up, and whom he might like without feeling intimidated. She may literally be from the same neighborhood as the hero.” David’s computer skills are not ordinary, but in all other respects, the shoe clearly fits.

So, my blogathon entry kinda went off the rails. Nevertheless, I did learn a couple things. Like, it’s a lot more fun being a sixteen year old sitting in the theater and watching a pretty girl than it is being a fifty year old man trying to fit her character into a mold so as to have something to say about her. Also, it made me think we need more movies about girls who like computers and who are really good at problem solving, staying one step ahead of the adults, and saving the world. (In a post Wonder Woman world, this is possible, right!?) And finally, I realized that Sheedy, especially given that she didn’t have a whole lot to work with, gave a heck of a performance, and that is at least part of what I was responding to. The success of the movie depends largely on the contrast between David and Jennifer as the sweet, innocent teenagers who inadvertently open Pandora’s box and all the cynical, angry, disconnected adults who surround them, and this image is built during the early part of the movie where Jennifer is prominent.

Anyway, when we do get that movie about the girl hacker who saves the world, I hope it has a boy next door in it that all the sixteen year old girls get as much fun out of as I got from watching Ally Sheedy as Jennifer. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, right? We just need someone to bring balance to the force.  Oh wait . . .

8 Comments Add yours

  1. You make an excellent point about girl hackers who save the world, and where IS that movie already!

    I liked that you compared your youthful impressions of Ally Sheedy’s character to your recent impressions. I get annoyed with the “dream girl” business because a person doesn’t often get a sense of what that female character is really like. She’s usually one-dimensional and, as in Wargames, is noticeably absent for large chunks of the film.

    Anyway, I feel a rant coming on, so I’ll end with a thank you for joining the blogathon, and for sharing your thoughts on Jennifer Mack. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. J.D. says:

      I guess HACKERS kinda features a girl hacker saving the world with Angelina Jolie as the sole girl in a group of guy computer nerds. She holds her throughout most of the movie.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Randall Green says:

        Haven’t seen that one yet. I’ll add it to my watch list. Thanks!


  2. There is nothing wrong with an innocent crush. It’s the baby step in relationships, and it usually falls to the literal or figurative boy or girl next door. Movie publicity is built on it, Charlie Brown.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. J.D. says:

    Yeah, I thought Sheedy was pretty awesome in this movie as well. She and Broderick have fantastic chemistry in it and I like that she’s as much of a screw-up at school as he is and that’s how they bond initially. Their relationship develops naturally over the course of the film. I also like how Sheedy holds her when things start to go crazy towards the end. Her character never seems to get lost amidst all the chaos.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. maedez says:

    My husband remembers this film fondly. He was 17 when it came out. I imagine his original impressions were much like yours. I really love the contrast between your 1983 and 2017 feelings. It’s a great angle! Thanks so much for joining our little blogathon.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Randall Green says:

      Thanks for having me! I tease my wife that she has to read my blog entries because it’s in our marriage vows, but other than her, if not for these blogathons, no one would ever read them. While I’m not doing it because I expect to gain a huge following and be able to put pressure on the film industry to make whatever movies I want (though that would be awesome), anyone who writes wants to be read at some level, so it’s nice when that happens.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s